Mervyn and Trish wrote: ↑02 Feb 2020, 15:37But you've left the question about the aforementioned that started the conversation Sir Modplod.
It's the usual Merv......one rule for one ...etc
Mervyn and Trish wrote: ↑02 Feb 2020, 15:37But you've left the question about the aforementioned that started the conversation Sir Modplod.
I think a couple of posts leaned towards whether they liked XX not whether they missed him ........Which makes Modplod actions correct in my opinion..Mervyn and Trish wrote: ↑02 Feb 2020, 15:37But you've left the question about the aforementioned that started the conversation Sir Modplod.
If whether or not a poster disliked a fellow forum member, there would probably be a lot fewer posts allowed.Onelife wrote: ↑02 Feb 2020, 18:02I think a couple of posts leaned towards whether they liked MM not whether they missed him ........Which makes Modplod actions correct in my opinion..Mervyn and Trish wrote: ↑02 Feb 2020, 15:37But you've left the question about the aforementioned that started the conversation Sir Modplod.
We have criticised most EU politicians on here quite regularly, and since I doubt any of them are forum members, then presumably they would likely fall into the same right of reply category???oldbluefox wrote: ↑02 Feb 2020, 20:19Should we not just accept that whilst bassman67 is entitled to his point of view any debate on this would be unacceptable when said person has no right of reply?
Mervyn and Trish wrote: ↑02 Feb 2020, 20:28Well he posed a question alongside an opinion. Seems odd to allow the question but not the answers. I just thought it would be tidier to remove both. But hey ho. No big deal.
There was nothing amiss with the original posting … it was the responses that violated the rules of the ForumMervyn and Trish wrote: ↑02 Feb 2020, 15:37But you've left the question about the aforementioned that started the conversation Sir Modplod.
The question is which variety of Plod, is it Inspector Mallory from Father Brown, or Herr Flick of the Gestapo in 'Allo Allo!