If anyone is having problems logging in and is getting the following message:

"The submitted form was invalid. Try submitting again"

Then try clearing your browser cache

Current Affairs

Chat about anything here
User avatar

Gill W
Senior First Officer
Senior First Officer
Posts: 4897
Joined: January 2013
Location: Kent

Re: Current Affairs

Unread post by Gill W »

Stephen wrote: 25 Jan 2022, 12:43
Probably friends of Virginia Giuffre
A young girl speaking out against rich and powerful men - it doesn’t take much imagination to understand how difficult that would have been when she was 17.
Gill


Bensham33
Senior Second Officer
Senior Second Officer
Posts: 706
Joined: October 2020

Re: Current Affairs

Unread post by Bensham33 »

This 'party' thing is getting out of hand. The police are investigating. This will go on for months now. Boris will like that.
Up the Palace

User avatar

towny44
Deputy Captain
Deputy Captain
Posts: 9670
Joined: January 2013
Location: Huddersfield

Re: Current Affairs

Unread post by towny44 »

Gill W wrote: 25 Jan 2022, 13:17
Stephen wrote: 25 Jan 2022, 12:43
Probably friends of Virginia Giuffre
A young girl speaking out against rich and powerful men - it doesn’t take much imagination to understand how difficult that would have been when she was 17.
...and probably enjoying the rich lifestyle, otherwise she wouldn't have kept coming back for more.
John

Trainee Pensioner since 2000

User avatar

towny44
Deputy Captain
Deputy Captain
Posts: 9670
Joined: January 2013
Location: Huddersfield

Re: Current Affairs

Unread post by towny44 »

Bensham33 wrote: 25 Jan 2022, 13:22
This 'party' thing is getting out of hand. The police are investigating. This will go on for months now. Boris will like that.
I'm surprised Angie Raynor didn't accuse Boris of orchestrating the police involvement, just so it would slow down the process.
John

Trainee Pensioner since 2000

User avatar

Onelife
Captain
Captain
Posts: 14196
Joined: January 2013

Re: Current Affairs

Unread post by Onelife »

oldbluefox wrote: 25 Jan 2022, 12:59
Seems strange that after years of inactivity these people suddenly decide to go to the papers to report something which they should have reported to the authorities at the time. Of course there couldn't be an ulterior motive could there?
I know where you are coming from Foxy and there is a part of me that agrees with you, however, from my understanding this then young girl came from a troubled background not unlike many young Iranian girls which are being trafficked to the UK for use in the sex trade. Many of theses girls are easy pickings for older seemingly wealthy, soon to become boyfriends who then draw them into believing they are cared for and loved. Sadly, the reality soon becomes a life of sex drugs and abuse.

In the case of Viginia Cruff whilst there may be an element of payback time for her, I prefer to see it from the eyes of what was then an impressionable 17-year-old who was eventually to become Epstein’s and Maxwells sexual play thing, distributed to whoever they thought might enjoy sexual encounters with an underage girl.

How one perceives exploitation is perhaps a difficult one but given the circumstances of how she was enticed into sleeping with overweight drooling old men then I ask myself who at the age of 17 really understand their best life choices.

She was exploited in order that others could make those choices for her.

User avatar

Mervyn and Trish
Commodore
Commodore
Posts: 17037
Joined: February 2013

Re: Current Affairs

Unread post by Mervyn and Trish »

It's funny that those who considered Sue Gray's investigation inadequate are now not happy with a police investigation.

User avatar

Mervyn and Trish
Commodore
Commodore
Posts: 17037
Joined: February 2013

Re: Current Affairs

Unread post by Mervyn and Trish »

barney wrote: 25 Jan 2022, 11:30
Exactly Merv.
It’s pile in time. If this ex minister was so traumatised, why didn’t she take the opportunity when offered?
The minutes of the incident may well just show that she was bloody useless, like the majority of them.
Of course she’ll claim to be the victim of prejudice (fill in your own one)
An example without naming names. A female presenter who was dropped by the BBC claimed sexual discrimination. Some who worked with her said there was no discrimination. She just wasn't up to the job. As a viewer I agree.

User avatar

Gill W
Senior First Officer
Senior First Officer
Posts: 4897
Joined: January 2013
Location: Kent

Re: Current Affairs

Unread post by Gill W »

towny44 wrote: 25 Jan 2022, 14:25
Gill W wrote: 25 Jan 2022, 13:17
Stephen wrote: 25 Jan 2022, 12:43
Probably friends of Virginia Giuffre
A young girl speaking out against rich and powerful men - it doesn’t take much imagination to understand how difficult that would have been when she was 17.
...and probably enjoying the rich lifestyle, otherwise she wouldn't have kept coming back for more.
Oh my God
Gill

User avatar

Gill W
Senior First Officer
Senior First Officer
Posts: 4897
Joined: January 2013
Location: Kent

Re: Current Affairs

Unread post by Gill W »

Onelife wrote: 25 Jan 2022, 14:30


In the case of Viginia Cruff whilst there may be an element of payback time for her, I prefer to see it from the eyes of what was then an impressionable 17-year-old who was eventually to become Epstein’s and Maxwells sexual play thing, distributed to whoever they thought might enjoy sexual encounters with an underage girl.

How one perceives exploitation is perhaps a difficult one but given the circumstances of how she was enticed into sleeping with overweight drooling old men then I ask myself who at the age of 17 really understand their best life choices.

She was exploited in order that others could make those choices for her.
Well said, Keith
Gill

User avatar

barney
Deputy Captain
Deputy Captain
Posts: 5853
Joined: March 2013
Location: Instow Devon

Re: Current Affairs

Unread post by barney »

Mervyn and Trish wrote: 25 Jan 2022, 14:36
barney wrote: 25 Jan 2022, 11:30
Exactly Merv.
It’s pile in time. If this ex minister was so traumatised, why didn’t she take the opportunity when offered?
The minutes of the incident may well just show that she was bloody useless, like the majority of them.
Of course she’ll claim to be the victim of prejudice (fill in your own one)
An example without naming names. A female presenter who was dropped by the BBC claimed sexual discrimination. Some who worked with her said there was no discrimination. She just wasn't up to the job. As a viewer I agree.
When I worked for HMG, we had a young lady of Asian decent (English born) who always played the race or sex card when she was overlooked for a position.
The reality was that she was constantly behind the curve, but nobody in authority had the gonads to tell her.
Neither would any colleague because we were all conscious of the potential ramifications.
So, every appraisal, she got through by the skin of her teeth and we had to live with it.
That’s life.
Free and Accepted

User avatar

Manoverboard
Ex Team Member
Posts: 13014
Joined: January 2013
Location: Dorset

Re: Current Affairs

Unread post by Manoverboard »

towny44 wrote: 25 Jan 2022, 14:25
...and probably enjoying the rich lifestyle, otherwise she wouldn't have kept coming back for more.
There had to be a level of enjoyment, praps she's a nympho ;)

I do also wonder if she's going to return the trinkets that she doubtless received along the way ?
Keep smiling, it's good for your well being

User avatar

Onelife
Captain
Captain
Posts: 14196
Joined: January 2013

Re: Current Affairs

Unread post by Onelife »

Gill W wrote: 25 Jan 2022, 15:14
towny44 wrote: 25 Jan 2022, 14:25
Gill W wrote: 25 Jan 2022, 13:17


A young girl speaking out against rich and powerful men - it doesn’t take much imagination to understand how difficult that would have been when she was 17.
...and probably enjoying the rich lifestyle, otherwise she wouldn't have kept coming back for more.
Oh my God
I thought the same but didn't think it worth replying :sick:

User avatar

oldbluefox
Ex Team Member
Posts: 12538
Joined: January 2013
Location: Cumbria

Re: Current Affairs

Unread post by oldbluefox »

Onelife wrote: 25 Jan 2022, 14:30
oldbluefox wrote: 25 Jan 2022, 12:59
Seems strange that after years of inactivity these people suddenly decide to go to the papers to report something which they should have reported to the authorities at the time. Of course there couldn't be an ulterior motive could there?
I know where you are coming from Foxy and there is a part of me that agrees with you, however, from my understanding this then young girl came from a troubled background not unlike many young Iranian girls which are being trafficked to the UK for use in the sex trade. Many of theses girls are easy pickings for older seemingly wealthy, soon to become boyfriends who then draw them into believing they are cared for and loved. Sadly, the reality soon becomes a life of sex drugs and abuse.

In the case of Viginia Cruff whilst there may be an element of payback time for her, I prefer to see it from the eyes of what was then an impressionable 17-year-old who was eventually to become Epstein’s and Maxwells sexual play thing, distributed to whoever they thought might enjoy sexual encounters with an underage girl.

How one perceives exploitation is perhaps a difficult one but given the circumstances of how she was enticed into sleeping with overweight drooling old men then I ask myself who at the age of 17 really understand their best life choices.

She was exploited in order that others could make those choices for her.
I was actually talking in general terms but it applies equally to all except very young children.
I was taught to be cautious

User avatar

Mervyn and Trish
Commodore
Commodore
Posts: 17037
Joined: February 2013

Re: Current Affairs

Unread post by Mervyn and Trish »

I do think a vulnerable 17 year old, underage in the eyes of the law, is in a different position to a grown woman old enough to become an MP and mature enough to become a Minister. In the latter case I do smell a rat when she apparently declined the complaint route offered at the time, didn't pursue any other complaint route she considered more appropriate and only breaks cover when she scents blood.
Last edited by Mervyn and Trish on 25 Jan 2022, 15:57, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar

Onelife
Captain
Captain
Posts: 14196
Joined: January 2013

Re: Current Affairs

Unread post by Onelife »

Re: post 13813 it should have read…

‘Ukraine’

User avatar

Mervyn and Trish
Commodore
Commodore
Posts: 17037
Joined: February 2013

Re: Current Affairs

Unread post by Mervyn and Trish »

barney wrote: 25 Jan 2022, 15:20
Mervyn and Trish wrote: 25 Jan 2022, 14:36
barney wrote: 25 Jan 2022, 11:30
Exactly Merv.
It’s pile in time. If this ex minister was so traumatised, why didn’t she take the opportunity when offered?
The minutes of the incident may well just show that she was bloody useless, like the majority of them.
Of course she’ll claim to be the victim of prejudice (fill in your own one)
An example without naming names. A female presenter who was dropped by the BBC claimed sexual discrimination. Some who worked with her said there was no discrimination. She just wasn't up to the job. As a viewer I agree.
When I worked for HMG, we had a young lady of Asian decent (English born) who always played the race or sex card when she was overlooked for a position.
The reality was that she was constantly behind the curve, but nobody in authority had the gonads to tell her.
Neither would any colleague because we were all conscious of the potential ramifications.
So, every appraisal, she got through by the skin of her teeth and we had to live with it.
That’s life.
I had a similar experience with a gay guy. If anyone criticised him he immediately played the homophobia card. A complete nightmare to performance manage. I have nothing against him being gay. His business and of no concern to me. But he was a very nasty piece of work who made colleagues' lives hell.

User avatar

oldbluefox
Ex Team Member
Posts: 12538
Joined: January 2013
Location: Cumbria

Re: Current Affairs

Unread post by oldbluefox »

Mervyn and Trish wrote: 25 Jan 2022, 15:56
I do think a vulnerable 17 year old, underage in the eyes of the law, is in a different position to a grown woman old enough to become an MP and mature enough to become a Minister. In the latter case I do smell a rat when she apparently declined the complaint route offered at the time, didn't pursue any other complaint route she considered more appropriate and only breaks cover when she scents blood.
The age of consent in UK is 16 so she would not be underage.
I was taught to be cautious

User avatar

Manoverboard
Ex Team Member
Posts: 13014
Joined: January 2013
Location: Dorset

Re: Current Affairs

Unread post by Manoverboard »

It used to be different in different States within the USA ... crossing the State line as they used to say
Keep smiling, it's good for your well being

User avatar

Mervyn and Trish
Commodore
Commodore
Posts: 17037
Joined: February 2013

Re: Current Affairs

Unread post by Mervyn and Trish »

IMF forecasts UK growth to be lower than expected in 2022 as it recovers from the Covid, pandemic, but still the fastest in the G7, as it was last year. Brexit has been a real disaster hasn't it?

User avatar

Mervyn and Trish
Commodore
Commodore
Posts: 17037
Joined: February 2013

Re: Current Affairs

Unread post by Mervyn and Trish »

oldbluefox wrote: 25 Jan 2022, 16:11
Mervyn and Trish wrote: 25 Jan 2022, 15:56
I do think a vulnerable 17 year old, underage in the eyes of the law, is in a different position to a grown woman old enough to become an MP and mature enough to become a Minister. In the latter case I do smell a rat when she apparently declined the complaint route offered at the time, didn't pursue any other complaint route she considered more appropriate and only breaks cover when she scents blood.
The age of consent in UK is 16 so she would not be underage.
Yes sorry I should have been clearer. Underage in the eyes of US law, where she's pursuing the case.

User avatar

screwy
Senior First Officer
Senior First Officer
Posts: 3033
Joined: March 2013
Location: Lancashire

Re: Current Affairs

Unread post by screwy »

Changing the subject because I spent 26 yrs locking up people for having underage sex, male and females I would add.!

Has anyone else found it impossible to buy the ‘ Cube ‘ boxes of tissues.?
Mel

User avatar

Mervyn and Trish
Commodore
Commodore
Posts: 17037
Joined: February 2013

Re: Current Affairs

Unread post by Mervyn and Trish »

Yes, if only because they are more expensive than the cheap own brand ones we normally buy. 😆

User avatar

Kendhni
Ex Team Member
Posts: 6520
Joined: January 2013

Re: Current Affairs

Unread post by Kendhni »

Mervyn and Trish wrote: 25 Jan 2022, 16:30
IMF forecasts UK growth to be lower than expected in 2022 as it recovers from the Covid, pandemic, but still the fastest in the G7, as it was last year. Brexit has been a real disaster hasn't it?
I think you probably appreciate that does not show a clear picture. In 2020 the UK seriously lagged behind many other comparitive countries as they recovered but the UK didn't. So for 2021 it was starting from a very low base point and caught up rapidly during the first half of 2021. However in Q3 and Q4 it appears to have fallen back quite a bit to 5th place behind France, Italy, Germany and Canada (with the US and Japan showing lower figures). Over the course of the pandemic the UK economy has contracted by 1.5% placing them in second last place within the G7.

So at this point I don't think any serious conclusion can be made about success or failure.

User avatar

Mervyn and Trish
Commodore
Commodore
Posts: 17037
Joined: February 2013

Re: Current Affairs

Unread post by Mervyn and Trish »

Maybe so. But falling 1.5% in a pandemic is not the disaster Project Fear predicted. And inwas only quoting the IMF. What do they know eh?

#GlassHalfFull
Last edited by Mervyn and Trish on 25 Jan 2022, 17:56, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar

Mervyn and Trish
Commodore
Commodore
Posts: 17037
Joined: February 2013

Re: Current Affairs

Unread post by Mervyn and Trish »

The opposition parties up their demands for Boris to resign ahead of the outcome of the Gray inquiry and the police investigation.

What's wrong with waiting for the conclusions? Are they afraid the results won't justify their demands?

I'm not defending anyone. I just want the jury to reach their verdict before sentence is passed.

Return to “General Chat”