1000'th post

Unread post by **HK phooey** » 15 Feb 2013, 16:50

Red penned would be an improvement, they just keep disappearing!

Unread post by **oldbluefox** » 15 Feb 2013, 16:52

By the time I have red-penned there's nowt left, phooey.

Unread post by **HK phooey** » 15 Feb 2013, 16:53

Leave them alone Foxy, they are words of wisdom

Unread post by **jacksparrow** » 15 Feb 2013, 18:58

Would it not be a good idea for any post that has been 'smurfed' that the poster looses a point, that way it would act as a small demotion for the error of their ways....

Unread post by **Romig1** » 15 Feb 2013, 19:00

jacksparrow wrote:
Would it not be a good idea for any post that has been 'smurfed' that the poster looses a point, that way it would act as a small demotion for the error of their ways....

I agree Jack..... never knowingly Smurfed yet!

Unread post by **Boris+** » 15 Feb 2013, 19:08

Wowee - can I vote for that

Em

Unread post by **wolfie** » 15 Feb 2013, 19:37

No, it's not a poll, yet.

Unread post by **gfwgfw** » 15 Feb 2013, 20:02

Evening all

What is paramount to make for an interesting forum

Quality or Quantity

Unread post by **david63** » 15 Feb 2013, 21:20

Romig1 wrote:
I agree Jack..... never knowingly Smurfed yet!

There's always a first time

Unread post by **Kendhni** » 15 Feb 2013, 21:23

gfwgfw wrote:
Evening all

What is paramount to make for an interesting forum

Quality or Quantity

Why do we have to choose when ican achieve both

Unread post by **wolfie** » 15 Feb 2013, 22:12

gfwgfw wrote:
Evening all

What is paramount to make for an interesting forum

Quality or Quantity

I aim for, but do not often succeed, for quality, but you, gfw, I really thought that quantity was your thing!

Unread post by **wolfie** » 15 Feb 2013, 22:13

david63 wrote:
Romig1 wrote:
I agree Jack..... never knowingly Smurfed yet!
There's always a first time

Unread post by **wolfie** » 15 Feb 2013, 22:15

Kendhni wrote:
gfwgfw wrote:
Evening all

What is paramount to make for an interesting forum

Quality or Quantity
Why do we have to choose when ican achieve both

Nice one. Ken

Unread post by **Romig1** » 15 Feb 2013, 22:16

Three postings on the spin Wolfie....you wouldn't be trying to be the first to 1000 would you?

Unread post by **wolfie** » 15 Feb 2013, 22:18

Nah, can't be bovvered, just going on david's worldie, that's enough for me.

Unread post by **wolfie** » 15 Feb 2013, 22:19

Romig1 wrote:
Three postings on the spin Wolfie....you wouldn't be trying to be the first to 1000 would you?

Just emulating you dear!

Unread post by **david63** » 15 Feb 2013, 22:20

Now then - who's post count shall I reduce?

Unread post by **wolfie** » 15 Feb 2013, 22:21

And for a 3rd one.............again.

Romig, you were stalking my posts this time last night, I shall have to contact Wina, it's getting to be a habit!!!

Unread post by **wolfie** » 15 Feb 2013, 22:24

david63 wrote:
Now then - who's post count shall I reduce?

Bother, your post just got in the way of another trio of mine!!

Just as I was about to **** off Romig again.

But, can I still come on your worldie

Unread post by **wolfie** » 15 Feb 2013, 22:41

I take that as a, No, then!

Gottcha Romig, another trio!!

Oooo, I'm getting the hang of this mutiple posting lark R.

Unread post by **kaymar** » 17 Feb 2013, 17:40

Jan Rosser wrote:
Well whose your money on for the person making the 1000'th post on this site?

And are we actually bovvered?

Unread post by **Manoverboard** » 17 Feb 2013, 17:54

With 103 posts .... probably not

Unread post by **wolfie** » 17 Feb 2013, 19:42

Manoverboard wrote:
With 103 posts .... probably not

Ouch

Cruise Community Forum

1000'th post

Re: 1000'th post

Re: 1000'th post

Re: 1000'th post

Re: 1000'th post

Re: 1000'th post

Re: 1000'th post

Re: 1000'th post

Re: 1000'th post

Re: 1000'th post

Re: 1000'th post

Re: 1000'th post

Re: 1000'th post

Re: 1000'th post

Re: 1000'th post

Re: 1000'th post

Re: 1000'th post

Re: 1000'th post

Re: 1000'th post

Re: 1000'th post

Re: 1000'th post

Re: 1000'th post

Re: 1000'th post

Re: 1000'th post

Board Disclaimer