Nah, she's far more eloquent than I could ever be.barney wrote: 26 Mar 2019, 18:58Wow. You sound more like Jack Staff every day. Separated at birth by any chance![]()
It was a busy day at the maternity hospital with all 16,141,241 of us.

Nah, she's far more eloquent than I could ever be.barney wrote: 26 Mar 2019, 18:58Wow. You sound more like Jack Staff every day. Separated at birth by any chance![]()


Jack Staff wrote: 26 Mar 2019, 21:30Nah, she's far more eloquent than I could ever be.barney wrote: 26 Mar 2019, 18:58Wow. You sound more like Jack Staff every day. Separated at birth by any chance![]()
It was a busy day at the maternity hospital with all 16,141,241 of us.
Crikey a remainer mutual admiration duo, this must be some sort of cunning plan to blindside us.Gill W wrote: 26 Mar 2019, 22:18Thank you Jack.
As I have often thought that you explain things much better than me, that is high praise indeed.![]()

No.towny44 wrote: 26 Mar 2019, 22:22Crikey a remainer mutual admiration duo, this must be some sort of cunning plan to blindside us.


It is a big problem that the EU is taking action on....towny44 wrote: 26 Mar 2019, 22:44BBC headlines "Loss of British bees threatens food security"..................surely this must be Brexit's fault?![]()

I suspect the bosses of the EU might have more pull their side of the channel, I believe Bayer now owns Monsanto, and of course Syngenta is Swiss, so won't be bothered either way.Jack Staff wrote: 26 Mar 2019, 22:51It is a big problem that the EU is taking action on....towny44 wrote: 26 Mar 2019, 22:44BBC headlines "Loss of British bees threatens food security"..................surely this must be Brexit's fault?![]()
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-43910536
This is exactly the kind of thing that the bosses of Brexit want to avoid as it harms their profits.

?towny44 wrote: 26 Mar 2019, 23:21I suspect the bosses of the EU might have more pull their side of the channel,
Yes, I believe that too.
So the point of your post was......


I remember a story about Jack and Gilltowny44 wrote: 26 Mar 2019, 22:22Crikey a remainer mutual admiration duo, this must be some sort of cunning plan to blindside us.

About as relevant as most of your posts Jack.Jack Staff wrote: 26 Mar 2019, 23:30?towny44 wrote: 26 Mar 2019, 23:21I suspect the bosses of the EU might have more pull their side of the channel,Yes, I believe that too.So the point of your post was......

And the Leavers on this forum DON’T back each other up?towny44 wrote: 26 Mar 2019, 22:22Jack Staff wrote: 26 Mar 2019, 21:30Nah, she's far more eloquent than I could ever be.barney wrote: 26 Mar 2019, 18:58Wow. You sound more like Jack Staff every day. Separated at birth by any chance![]()
It was a busy day at the maternity hospital with all 16,141,241 of us.Crikey a remainer mutual admiration duo, this must be some sort of cunning plan to blindside us.Gill W wrote: 26 Mar 2019, 22:18Thank you Jack.
As I have often thought that you explain things much better than me, that is high praise indeed.![]()



Most sensible people are stockpiling. I should imagine companies are doing the same. Of course the economy is doing well, at the moment, preparing.

Not at all Jack !Jack Staff wrote: 27 Mar 2019, 11:36Most sensible people are stockpiling. I should imagine companies are doing the same. Of course the economy is doing well, at the moment, preparing.
Tusk is (as you know) referring to the majority in the country. Aren't you dizzy with all this spinning?




Jack, do you know this for a fact or are you just speculating to paint JRM in as bad a light as possible.Jack Staff wrote: 27 Mar 2019, 12:45Jacob Rees-Mogg admits changing his mind on May’s deal but remains 100% behind making as much money from Brexit as possible.
{HIGNFY}

I know for a fact it is a joke by Have I Got News For You.towny44 wrote: 27 Mar 2019, 12:54Jack, do you know this for a fact or are you just speculating to paint JRM in as bad a light as possible.




The only way we'd find out for sure is to have another referendum, as you reject all other means of gauging current opinion.barney wrote: 27 Mar 2019, 11:28Meanwhile, back in the factual world, The Guardian had to publish this through gritted teeth
https://www.theguardian.com/business/20 ... is-deepens
Just imagine how we would be flourishing had the losers not decided to try and overturn the result?
Back in the world of Fake News … from the same periodical
https://www.theguardian.com/politics/20 ... -50-brexit
You do the maths - half a million Remainers marching constitutes a 'majority' - five million clicks on a website constitutes a majority …
Only in the EU !![]()