If anyone is having problems logging in and is getting the following message:
"The submitted form was invalid. Try submitting again"
Then try clearing your browser cache
"The submitted form was invalid. Try submitting again"
Then try clearing your browser cache
Current Affairs
-
oldbluefox
- Ex Team Member
- Posts: 12538
- Joined: January 2013
- Location: Cumbria
Re: Current Affairs
Of course it is although some find difficulty in accepting it. The problem in this instance was timing. The amendment should have been proposed after Paterson had served his 30 day suspension.
I was taught to be cautious
-
Onelife
- Captain

- Posts: 14208
- Joined: January 2013
Re: Current Affairs
Agree...and his constituency will have the final say.oldbluefox wrote: 04 Nov 2021, 17:22Of course it is although some find difficulty in accepting it. The problem in this instance was timing. The amendment should have been proposed after Paterson had served his 30 day suspension.
-
screwy
- Senior First Officer

- Posts: 3033
- Joined: March 2013
- Location: Lancashire
-
Mervyn and Trish
- Commodore

- Posts: 17037
- Joined: February 2013
Re: Current Affairs
For those who think sleaze is a Tory phenomenon just Google Labour sleaze
#rosetintedspectacles
#rosetintedspectacles
-
Gill W
- Senior First Officer

- Posts: 4897
- Joined: January 2013
- Location: Kent
Re: Current Affairs
More #whataboutery
Why would I have #rosetintedspectacles when it comes to the Labour Party, when Iām not even a Labour supporter.
It seems that, to some people, itās more important to bang bring up past Labour wrongdoing than acknowledge corruption in our current government. It would make more sense if Claudia Webbeās name had been brought up.
In answer to my question this morning, when I asked if people are REALLY ok with what happened yesterday ( and whatās happened today ) I have to conclude that yes, some people are completely comfortable with the situation.
So I will continue to wait and see at what point those people finally think to themselves āthis isnāt rightā, and admit it in public.
Why would I have #rosetintedspectacles when it comes to the Labour Party, when Iām not even a Labour supporter.
It seems that, to some people, itās more important to bang bring up past Labour wrongdoing than acknowledge corruption in our current government. It would make more sense if Claudia Webbeās name had been brought up.
In answer to my question this morning, when I asked if people are REALLY ok with what happened yesterday ( and whatās happened today ) I have to conclude that yes, some people are completely comfortable with the situation.
So I will continue to wait and see at what point those people finally think to themselves āthis isnāt rightā, and admit it in public.
Gill
-
screwy
- Senior First Officer

- Posts: 3033
- Joined: March 2013
- Location: Lancashire
Re: Current Affairs
The point is. Were you so outraged and vociferous about other parties sleaze etc as you are about this government,simple question, Yes or No.?
Last edited by screwy on 05 Nov 2021, 08:21, edited 1 time in total.
Mel
-
Mervyn and Trish
- Commodore

- Posts: 17037
- Joined: February 2013
Re: Current Affairs
Who mentioned you specifically? I didn't.Gill W wrote: 04 Nov 2021, 23:43More #whataboutery
Why would I have #rosetintedspectacles when it comes to the Labour Party, when Iām not even a Labour supporter.
It seems that, to some people, itās more important to bang bring up past Labour wrongdoing than acknowledge corruption in our current government. It would make more sense if Claudia Webbeās name had been brought up.
In answer to my question this morning, when I asked if people are REALLY ok with what happened yesterday ( and whatās happened today ) I have to conclude that yes, some people are completely comfortable with the situation.
So I will continue to wait and see at what point those people finally think to themselves āthis isnāt rightā, and admit it in public.
#ifthecapfits
-
Kendhni
- Ex Team Member
- Posts: 6520
- Joined: January 2013
Re: Current Affairs
I think only a fool would be comfortable with the levels of corruption within the current government, including their total disregard for procedure, nepotism, and refusal to carry out due diligence in most of what it does. A major part of the problem is that Johnson has surrounded himself with "yes men" totally incapable of providing the necessary checks-and-balances.Gill W wrote: 04 Nov 2021, 23:43More #whataboutery
In answer to my question this morning, when I asked if people are REALLY ok with what happened yesterday ( and whatās happened today ) I have to conclude that yes, some people are completely comfortable with the situation.
The lack of any coherent counter argument just leaves the 'straw man'.
-
Onelife
- Captain

- Posts: 14208
- Joined: January 2013
Re: Current Affairs
It can only be a matter of time before one of those āYes men/womenā say No. Boris is out of his depth, has no leadership qualities, canāt think on his feet, and lacks good judgment.
If he survives the party will suffer.
If he survives the party will suffer.
-
Manoverboard
- Ex Team Member
- Posts: 13014
- Joined: January 2013
- Location: Dorset
Re: Current Affairs
Impossible to know of course but it is not unusual for one's spouse to be heavily implicated ... with or indeed without their knowledge.Frank Manning wrote: 04 Nov 2021, 14:39In yesterday's newspaper there was a quote to the effect that his poor lady wife's death had nothing to do with the scandal ....Manoverboard wrote: 04 Nov 2021, 10:20He may be as guilty as reported but is it not the case that his wife committed suicide over it ... and yet there are those who still want to milk it to death.
Keep smiling, it's good for your well being
-
screwy
- Senior First Officer

- Posts: 3033
- Joined: March 2013
- Location: Lancashire
Re: Current Affairs
Boris was voted Leader and subsequently PM to do one job,yes the B word, which he did.The rest has been a disaster although COVID hasnāt helped him, I agree he is a buffoon and out of his depth and the time is right for him to go. Who gets the job.?
Last edited by screwy on 05 Nov 2021, 10:38, edited 1 time in total.
Mel
-
Onelife
- Captain

- Posts: 14208
- Joined: January 2013
Re: Current Affairs
Gove....He's got everything Johnson hasn't got apart from the likability factor....his party need to rise above this and put the best man in the top job.screwy wrote: 05 Nov 2021, 10:37Boris was voted Leader and subsequently PM to do one job,yes the B word, which he did.The rest has been a disaster although COVID hasnāt helped him, I agree he is a buffoon and out of his depth and the time is right for him to go. Who gets the job.?
-
Gill W
- Senior First Officer

- Posts: 4897
- Joined: January 2013
- Location: Kent
Re: Current Affairs
I donāt think itās as simple as a yes or no answer.screwy wrote: 05 Nov 2021, 08:20The point is. Were you so outraged and vociferous about other parties sleaze etc as you are about this government,simple question, Yes or No.?
In the past, various MPs from all parties have been caught doing underhanded things. Cash for questions in the 90s springs to mind and the more recent MPs expenses scandal.
I certainly condemn wrongdoing by any individual MP, of any party.
In the past, when these scandals happen, there are usually moves within the parliamentary system for reforms to be made, to make it more difficult for a similar scandal to happen in the future.
At present, we have a government that is actively trying to make it easier for corrupt practices to occur. That is what makes me outraged and vociferous, as you put it. I would feel the same if a Labour government were acting in the same way.
Gill
-
screwy
- Senior First Officer

- Posts: 3033
- Joined: March 2013
- Location: Lancashire
-
Manoverboard
- Ex Team Member
- Posts: 13014
- Joined: January 2013
- Location: Dorset
Re: Current Affairs
Corruption to line one's pockets, at all levels, seems to have been the norm during my lifetime. My first encounter was in the 60s when a number of Northamptonshire Councilors ( who happened to be Builders ) were found be be awarding themselves building contracts ... 60 years on and it still happens in one form or another. Are they really really trying to stamp it out ?
.... outraged from Northamptonshire
A lot of it is seen as added perks, a bit like when Mortgages were +/-15% yet some Local Authority / Bank / Building Society employees were paying two and a quarter percent. Faced with that sort of perceived injustice some would look to identify ' benefits ' in their own place of work ... presumably.
.... outraged from Northamptonshire
A lot of it is seen as added perks, a bit like when Mortgages were +/-15% yet some Local Authority / Bank / Building Society employees were paying two and a quarter percent. Faced with that sort of perceived injustice some would look to identify ' benefits ' in their own place of work ... presumably.
Keep smiling, it's good for your well being
-
towny44
- Deputy Captain

- Posts: 9674
- Joined: January 2013
- Location: Huddersfield
Re: Current Affairs
I have not read a lot about this, but from what I have seen reported the govt were seeking to modify, or indeed create, an appeals procedure, so that an MP had the ability to defend his or herself before any sanction took place.
Which is significantly different to your interpretation above.
I probably agree with you that it should not have tried to do this to enable Owen Patterson to use the new ruling to delay his suspension, which I accept was crass and stupid.
Last edited by towny44 on 05 Nov 2021, 13:57, edited 1 time in total.
John
Trainee Pensioner since 2000
Trainee Pensioner since 2000
-
screwy
- Senior First Officer

- Posts: 3033
- Joined: March 2013
- Location: Lancashire
-
Gill W
- Senior First Officer

- Posts: 4897
- Joined: January 2013
- Location: Kent
Re: Current Affairs
As I understand it, the were seeking to get rid of the Independent Standards Commissioner and Standards Committee and replace it with a committee with an inbuilt Tory majority, then rip up the current rules and replace them with whatever they fancy - can't help suspecting that this would mean a lot less scrutiny.towny44 wrote: 05 Nov 2021, 13:55
I have not read a lot about this, but from what I have seen reported the govt were seeking to modify, or indeed create, an appeals procedure, so that an MP had the ability to defend his or herself before any sanction took place.
Which is significantly different to your interpretation above.
I think this idea of the creation of an appeals procedure might be a red herring - I don't know the ins and outs of it, but I've seen various comment that there is already a right to appeal in the current system.
Gill
-
towny44
- Deputy Captain

- Posts: 9674
- Joined: January 2013
- Location: Huddersfield
Re: Current Affairs
I think the current appeal is after the sanction has been applied, or at least that was the comment from a tory minister on politics live. Which does seem unfair if true.
John
Trainee Pensioner since 2000
Trainee Pensioner since 2000
-
Onelife
- Captain

- Posts: 14208
- Joined: January 2013
Re: Current Affairs
I may be wrong but I donāt think the Standards committee have any appeals process, they are there to look at the evidence then advise the government on their findings. If a government officer/ minister is found to be in breach of Government Ministerial code then the PM after consulting his cabinet decides on what, if any action should be taken. ā¦after which Boris then takes a freebie holiday.
-
Gill W
- Senior First Officer

- Posts: 4897
- Joined: January 2013
- Location: Kent
Re: Current Affairs
Iāve been having a rummage around and I canāt see any clear explanation of what the Independent Standards Commissioner process is, but from what Iāve seen I now tend to think there isnāt a formal appeals process. If the government was genuine in wanting to set up an appeals process, Iād expect it to entail an appeal to an independent entityā¦. Not a committee stuffed with sympathetic Tories.
I still tend to think the idea of an appeals process is a red herring though, and the real aim was to get rid of the independent commissioner
I still tend to think the idea of an appeals process is a red herring though, and the real aim was to get rid of the independent commissioner
Gill
-
Kendhni
- Ex Team Member
- Posts: 6520
- Joined: January 2013
Re: Current Affairs
Over the years, more than one elected politico has informed me "It is not about doing something, it is about being perceived to have done something". That unfortunately is still the mindset within politicians.Gill W wrote: 05 Nov 2021, 21:27Iāve been having a rummage around and I canāt see any clear explanation of what the Independent Standards Commissioner process is, but from what Iāve seen I now tend to think there isnāt a formal appeals process. If the government was genuine in wanting to set up an appeals process, Iād expect it to entail an appeal to an independent entityā¦. Not a committee stuffed with sympathetic Tories.
I still tend to think the idea of an appeals process is a red herring though, and the real aim was to get rid of the independent commissioner
-
Frank Manning
- First Officer

- Posts: 1979
- Joined: August 2013
- Location: Poole Dorset.
Re: Current Affairs
Anyway these MPs are the 'eroes of B, along with St Nigel. Untouchable.......Pass my wooden spoon.
-
oldbluefox
- Ex Team Member
- Posts: 12538
- Joined: January 2013
- Location: Cumbria
Re: Current Affairs
despite the attempts by those who did their best to overturn the result.Frank Manning wrote: 06 Nov 2021, 10:51Anyway these MPs are the 'eroes of B, along with St Nigel. Untouchable.......
Not sure how much longer Boris can survive. Tory backbenchers are getting more and more twitchy.
I was taught to be cautious
-
barney
- Deputy Captain

- Posts: 5853
- Joined: March 2013
- Location: Instow Devon
Re: Current Affairs
I see Johnson as a situational Prime Minister.oldbluefox wrote: 06 Nov 2021, 13:01despite the attempts by those who did their best to overturn the result.Frank Manning wrote: 06 Nov 2021, 10:51Anyway these MPs are the 'eroes of B, along with St Nigel. Untouchable.......
Not sure how much longer Boris can survive. Tory backbenchers are getting more and more twitchy.
He got the job on get Brexit done.
He had a massive election victory with get Brexit done.
I said at the time that I thought it unlikely that he would still be around come the next election and I still stand by that.
He can ride off into the sunset and swell his bank account as ex PM on the speaking circuit.
If John Major gets work, thereās hope for anybody.
Free and Accepted