davecttr wrote:
Thinks - when are eurostar introducing their St Pancras - Marseille direct services?
Avignon is already direct, so Marseilles is already possible

davecttr wrote:
Thinks - when are eurostar introducing their St Pancras - Marseille direct services?

True Dave, though it you want to operate from a single port in the UK Southampton is closer to the majority of the popular destinations than any of the Northern ports - either east or west coast. The ideal would be to leave from a south coast port for the med, canaries, caribbean etc, and an east coast port for Baltic/Norway. But unless you commit a ship to being based in say Harwich and doing a whole season of north bound trips that means the inconvenience and cost of a repositioning cruise from time to time. Of course some lines originate their Baltic/Fjord cruises in places like Copenhagen or Amsterdam, which then makes it a fly/cruise, which doesn't suit many. No easy answer really.davecttr wrote:P&O's problem is made worse as there are only so many destinations you can get to from southampton without large time penalties. Even their Baltic cruises have further to sail than those cruise lines using east coast ports. Southampton is about 140 nautical miles further away from Norway than Harwich. That translates up to an additional sea day on those cruises.
Easy answer .... ?Mervyn and Trish wrote:True Dave, though it you want to operate from a single port in the UK Southampton is closer to the majority of the popular destinations than any of the Northern ports - either east or west coast. The ideal would be to leave from a south coast port for the med, canaries, caribbean etc, and an east coast port for Baltic/Norway. But unless you commit a ship to being based in say Harwich and doing a whole season of north bound trips that means the inconvenience and cost of a repositioning cruise from time to time. Of course some lines originate their Baltic/Fjord cruises in places like Copenhagen or Amsterdam, which then makes it a fly/cruise, which doesn't suit many. No easy answer really.davecttr wrote:P&O's problem is made worse as there are only so many destinations you can get to from southampton without large time penalties. Even their Baltic cruises have further to sail than those cruise lines using east coast ports. Southampton is about 140 nautical miles further away from Norway than Harwich. That translates up to an additional sea day on those cruises.


Not so ancient mariner wrote:....But do you get more port time/pay less if you choose to travel downstream?Manoverboard wrote:No such problems on Riverboat Cruising ...



Haha! Great minds, and all that...oldbluefox wrote:Apologies Angela. I have just posted something to this effect on 'Keeping their heads down' before I saw your post here.
You beat me to it!! ..........but it's good news nevertheless.

indeed, but there's more complaints this morning, so it may be they're only reinstating if peeps make a fussHoliday Planner wrote:Looking at comments on Facebook this evening, it looks as though a number of people who had made complaints have been phoned to say their port times have been reinstated. An interesting U turn.

Meg 50 wrote:indeed, but there's more complaints this morning, so it may be they're only reinstating if peeps make a fussHoliday Planner wrote:Looking at comments on Facebook this evening, it looks as though a number of people who had made complaints have been phoned to say their port times have been reinstated. An interesting U turn.

