If anyone is having problems logging in and is getting the following message:

"The submitted form was invalid. Try submitting again"

Then try clearing your browser cache

Brexit

Chat about anything here
User avatar

barney
Deputy Captain
Deputy Captain
Posts: 5853
Joined: March 2013
Location: Instow Devon

Re: Brexit

Unread post by barney »

Interview on BBS Business channel yesterday.
They were talking to an analyst about Dixon Carphone Warehouse
Sale of mobile phones down by 5% - due to Brexit uncertainty
Sale of large screen TVs up by 15% - despite Brexit uncertainty

Sky News Project Armageddon went into hyper drive this morning on Adam Boulton show.
They had a reporter talking to the company that make insulin in Denmark.
Will their be shortages in the UK because people are already stockpiling.?
We don't envisage that happening said the guy.
But people are concerned said the reporter.
Of course they are, but we're pretty sure everything will be ok, said the guy.

So, in summary, Brexit chaos and the supplier cannot 100% guarantee supplies will flow.

The next story was that only 15% of traffic will flow through Dover according to a 'leaked' report.
Do they think we are total idiots and don't understand how modern customs work?
Do they think that there will be a little man standing at a barrier, checking each consignment?
It hasn't worked like that years.

I have a friend in Kent who owns a major candle import company. He's Danish by the way.
I am talking millions of candles a year.
They are manufactured in China and arrive by the container load into Tilbury docks.
A declaration is made in advance and every now and then, a random container may be checked, but by and all it's a documented transaction.
That could be done in Ireland and that could be done at Dover

Instead of finding solutions to relatively minor problems, some are putting un-necessary obstacles in the way

I give up !
I honestly do!
What is wrong with theses people ?
Free and Accepted

User avatar

Manoverboard
Ex Team Member
Posts: 13014
Joined: January 2013
Location: Dorset

Re: Brexit

Unread post by Manoverboard »

It is interesting to note that a poster or two have told us that people are or will be stockpiling medicines, how do they do that ?

In darkest Darzet our repeat prescriptions are on t'puter and t'puter will not let us re-order unless we are within a week of running out.

Surely we are not at the forefront of technology ?
Keep smiling, it's good for your well being


Ray Scully
Senior First Officer
Senior First Officer
Posts: 2069
Joined: January 2013
Location: Lancashire

Re: Brexit

Unread post by Ray Scully »

barney wrote: 23 Jan 2019, 10:42
Interview on BBS Business channel yesterday.
They were talking to an analyst about Dixon Carphone Warehouse
Sale of mobile phones down by 5% - due to Brexit uncertainty
Sale of large screen TVs up by 15% - despite Brexit uncertainty

Sky News Project Armageddon went into hyper drive this morning on Adam Boulton show.
They had a reporter talking to the company that make insulin in Denmark.
Will their be shortages in the UK because people are already stockpiling.?
We don't envisage that happening said the guy.
But people are concerned said the reporter.
Of course they are, but we're pretty sure everything will be ok, said the guy.

So, in summary, Brexit chaos and the supplier cannot 100% guarantee supplies will flow.

The next story was that only 15% of traffic will flow through Dover according to a 'leaked' report.
Do they think we are total idiots and don't understand how modern customs work?
Do they think that there will be a little man standing at a barrier, checking each consignment?
It hasn't worked like that years.

I have a friend in Kent who owns a major candle import company. He's Danish by the way.
I am talking millions of candles a year.
They are manufactured in China and arrive by the container load into Tilbury docks.
A declaration is made in advance and every now and then, a random container may be checked, but by and all it's a documented transaction.
That could be done in Ireland and that could be done at Dover

Instead of finding solutions to relatively minor problems, some are putting un-necessary obstacles in the way

I give up !
I honestly do!
What is wrong with theses people ?
Barney, are you suggesting that the Irish border resolution is a relatively minor problem?

User avatar

Topic author
Mervyn and Trish
Commodore
Commodore
Posts: 17037
Joined: February 2013

Re: Brexit

Unread post by Mervyn and Trish »

Jack Staff wrote: 22 Jan 2019, 21:25
barney wrote: 22 Jan 2019, 21:22
We are leaving the EU. Have you not been keeping up.
Doesn't look like Dyson thinks so.
Sorry Jack, but I think you just tripped over the Remain argument. So you say Dyson is moving his HQ because he believes we are staying in the EU? Where I thought the argument was he was leaving because he was worried we were leaving the EU.
Last edited by Mervyn and Trish on 23 Jan 2019, 12:20, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar

Topic author
Mervyn and Trish
Commodore
Commodore
Posts: 17037
Joined: February 2013

Re: Brexit

Unread post by Mervyn and Trish »

Jack Staff wrote: 22 Jan 2019, 21:14
barney wrote: 22 Jan 2019, 20:17
That's common knowledge. His research and development is done in the UK where the most innovative minds are. Our little rock is world famous for innovation. (despite Brexit) :sarcasm: :lol:
...innovation and tax evasion.

Something that becomes a lot more difficult if we stay in the EU.
I wonder why the arch Brexiter, after all his campaigning has decided now is the time to leave. :think:
Hmmm. So tax evasion is more difficult in the EU. Where the head of the Commission is Juncker. Who was Prime Minister of Luxembourg which, allegedly, at the time had turned into a major European centre of corporate tax avoidance.

Oh the irony.

User avatar

Topic author
Mervyn and Trish
Commodore
Commodore
Posts: 17037
Joined: February 2013

Re: Brexit

Unread post by Mervyn and Trish »

Ray Scully wrote: 23 Jan 2019, 11:53
Barney, are you suggesting that the Irish border resolution is a relatively minor problem?
I think it could be if they wanted it to be. Irish business seems less bothered by the issue than the politicians using it to try to stop Brexit.

User avatar

Jack Staff
First Officer
First Officer
Posts: 1656
Joined: September 2016

Re: Brexit

Unread post by Jack Staff »

Mervyn and Trish wrote: 23 Jan 2019, 12:22
Hmmm. So tax evasion is more difficult in the EU. Where the head of the Commission is Juncker. Who was Prime Minister of Luxembourg which, allegedly, at the time had turned into a major European centre of corporate tax avoidance.

Oh the irony.
https://ec.europa.eu/taxation_customs/b ... rective_en
Testiculi ad Brexitum. Venceremos.

User avatar

Jack Staff
First Officer
First Officer
Posts: 1656
Joined: September 2016

Re: Brexit

Unread post by Jack Staff »

Mervyn and Trish wrote: 23 Jan 2019, 12:16
Sorry Jack, but I think you just tripped over the Remain argument. So you say Dyson is moving his HQ because he believes we are staying in the EU? Where I thought the argument was he was leaving because he was worried we were leaving the EU.
By moving to Singapore Dyson retains all the advantages of the UK pre Brexit (FTA with EU).
When we don't leave, post 1st April if Dyson stayed he would have to declare his tax to the EU.
Testiculi ad Brexitum. Venceremos.

User avatar

barney
Deputy Captain
Deputy Captain
Posts: 5853
Joined: March 2013
Location: Instow Devon

Re: Brexit

Unread post by barney »

Jack Staff wrote: 23 Jan 2019, 12:47
Mervyn and Trish wrote: 23 Jan 2019, 12:16
Sorry Jack, but I think you just tripped over the Remain argument. So you say Dyson is moving his HQ because he believes we are staying in the EU? Where I thought the argument was he was leaving because he was worried we were leaving the EU.
By moving to Singapore Dyson retains all the advantages of the UK pre Brexit (FTA with EU).
When we don't leave, post 1st April if Dyson stayed he would have to declare his tax to the EU.
You've lost me on that one Jack :crazy:
Free and Accepted

User avatar

Jack Staff
First Officer
First Officer
Posts: 1656
Joined: September 2016

Re: Brexit

Unread post by Jack Staff »

barney wrote: 23 Jan 2019, 12:51
You've lost me on that one Jack :crazy:
Dyson wants FTA with EU (for his company)
Dyson does not want to pay tax.
Singapore fits.
Don't think I can make it any simpler. Before you ask, no, I was not in the boardroom. Do I know this as fact? no.
This is purely musings, the kind of thing a forum is for. But it all fits the Brexiter M.O.
Testiculi ad Brexitum. Venceremos.

User avatar

barney
Deputy Captain
Deputy Captain
Posts: 5853
Joined: March 2013
Location: Instow Devon

Re: Brexit

Unread post by barney »

Oh. I shall be speaking to my accountant and see if I can set up something similar. I don't want to pay too much tax either.
Free and Accepted

User avatar

Jack Staff
First Officer
First Officer
Posts: 1656
Joined: September 2016

Re: Brexit

Unread post by Jack Staff »

barney wrote: 23 Jan 2019, 13:45
Oh. I shall be speaking to my accountant and see if I can set up something similar. I don't want to pay too much tax either.
You would be far better off simply buying Euros.
Testiculi ad Brexitum. Venceremos.

User avatar

Topic author
Mervyn and Trish
Commodore
Commodore
Posts: 17037
Joined: February 2013

Re: Brexit

Unread post by Mervyn and Trish »

Jack Staff wrote: 23 Jan 2019, 12:32
Mervyn and Trish wrote: 23 Jan 2019, 12:22
Hmmm. So tax evasion is more difficult in the EU. Where the head of the Commission is Juncker. Who was Prime Minister of Luxembourg which, allegedly, at the time had turned into a major European centre of corporate tax avoidance.

Oh the irony.
https://ec.europa.eu/taxation_customs/b ... rective_en
Yes Jack. So why hasn't Juncker been sacked? Isn't that like making a racist the head of the Equality Commission?
Last edited by Mervyn and Trish on 23 Jan 2019, 13:55, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar

screwy
Senior First Officer
Senior First Officer
Posts: 3033
Joined: March 2013
Location: Lancashire

Re: Brexit

Unread post by screwy »

And just why should we have to run our Tax receipts and Budgets through the Eu.? An organisation that doesn’t declare it’s books.! How I long for us to run our own Country again.
Mel

User avatar

Jack Staff
First Officer
First Officer
Posts: 1656
Joined: September 2016

Re: Brexit

Unread post by Jack Staff »

Mervyn and Trish wrote: 23 Jan 2019, 13:54
Yes Jack. So why hasn't Juncker been sacked? Isn't that like making a racist the head of the Equality Commission?
Not sure what you are trying to imply.
What's this to do with racism?
Testiculi ad Brexitum. Venceremos.

User avatar

Jack Staff
First Officer
First Officer
Posts: 1656
Joined: September 2016

Re: Brexit

Unread post by Jack Staff »

screwy wrote: 23 Jan 2019, 13:57
And just why should we have to run our Tax receipts and Budgets through the Eu.?
We don't
screwy wrote: 23 Jan 2019, 13:57
An organisation that doesn’t declare it’s books.!
What would you like to know? I'll see if I can find it for you.
screwy wrote: 23 Jan 2019, 13:57
How I long for us to run our own Country again.
We do and they way it has been run since the Brexit vote proves that. If the EU had a say, they would not allow a country to do so much damage to itself.
Testiculi ad Brexitum. Venceremos.

User avatar

Topic author
Mervyn and Trish
Commodore
Commodore
Posts: 17037
Joined: February 2013

Re: Brexit

Unread post by Mervyn and Trish »

Jack Staff wrote: 23 Jan 2019, 14:00
Mervyn and Trish wrote: 23 Jan 2019, 13:54
Yes Jack. So why hasn't Juncker been sacked? Isn't that like making a racist the head of the Equality Commission?
Not sure what you are trying to imply.
What's this to do with racism?
Not implying anything Jack.

Stating clearly. It's different.

But in case it passed you by Juncker was Prime Minister in a country which stands accused of being a haven for tax avoidance. Now he's one of the multiple Presidents of the EU, which you suggest makes tax dodging more difficult. Ironic eh?

The racism reference was what is called an analogy.

User avatar

barney
Deputy Captain
Deputy Captain
Posts: 5853
Joined: March 2013
Location: Instow Devon

Re: Brexit

Unread post by barney »

Jack Staff wrote: 23 Jan 2019, 14:06
screwy wrote: 23 Jan 2019, 13:57
And just why should we have to run our Tax receipts and Budgets through the Eu.?

We don't
screwy wrote: 23 Jan 2019, 13:57
An organisation that doesn’t declare it’s books.!
What would you like to know? I'll see if I can find it for you.
screwy wrote: 23 Jan 2019, 13:57
How I long for us to run our own Country again.
We do and they way it has been run since the Brexit vote proves that. If the EU had a say, they would not allow a country to do so much damage to itself.
I think you will find that we do jack.
Why do you think that there has been this huge rift with Italy recently and there will be one forthcoming with France, because of Macron's capitulation to the Yellow Vests.
It appears that you may not be the EU expert that you profess to be. ;) And after all these years of membership
Free and Accepted

User avatar

barney
Deputy Captain
Deputy Captain
Posts: 5853
Joined: March 2013
Location: Instow Devon

Re: Brexit

Unread post by barney »

Mervyn and Trish wrote: 23 Jan 2019, 14:25
Jack Staff wrote: 23 Jan 2019, 14:00
Mervyn and Trish wrote: 23 Jan 2019, 13:54
Yes Jack. So why hasn't Juncker been sacked? Isn't that like making a racist the head of the Equality Commission?
Not sure what you are trying to imply.
What's this to do with racism?
Not implying anything Jack.

Stating clearly. It's different.

But in case it passed you by Juncker was Prime Minister in a country which stands accused of being a haven for tax avoidance. Now he's one of the multiple Presidents of the EU, which you suggest makes tax dodging more difficult. Ironic eh?

The racism reference was what is called an analogy.
Luxembourg does have special exemptions Merv, as do Malta and Ireland.
Malta is dodgy as hell where taxation is concerned and scandals are virtually a daily occurrence. That is why most of the online gaming sites are based there. Very little regulation.
https://zugimpex.com/malta-tax.html

things may be changing shortly and they are not happy about it.
https://www.timesofmalta.com/articles/v ... ing.699710
This is one of the many issues where some seem to think that we would have a veto if the UK were to remain a member.

They are also Europe's number one for selling EU passports, (well, Maltese, but it's the same for access issues) to anyone who can stump up 600,00 Euros.
A Saudi family recently bought 16 in one go.
They are one of the few European countries to have a socialist Government, but they are clearly Blair type socialists.
Fill your pockets while you have the chance then land a cushy job in Brussels.
Last edited by barney on 23 Jan 2019, 15:15, edited 2 times in total.
Free and Accepted

User avatar

oldbluefox
Ex Team Member
Posts: 12538
Joined: January 2013
Location: Cumbria

Re: Brexit

Unread post by oldbluefox »

Jack Staff wrote: 23 Jan 2019, 12:32
Mervyn and Trish wrote: 23 Jan 2019, 12:22
Hmmm. So tax evasion is more difficult in the EU. Where the head of the Commission is Juncker. Who was Prime Minister of Luxembourg which, allegedly, at the time had turned into a major European centre of corporate tax avoidance.

Oh the irony.
https://ec.europa.eu/taxation_customs/b ... rective_en
Is this what Merv was talking about? "Jean-Claude Juncker blocked EU curbs on tax avoidance, cables show"
I was taught to be cautious

User avatar

barney
Deputy Captain
Deputy Captain
Posts: 5853
Joined: March 2013
Location: Instow Devon

Re: Brexit

Unread post by barney »

An excellent article from Politico EU.
Please read if you have time.
https://www.politico.eu/article/brexit- ... ew-brexit/
Free and Accepted

User avatar

Onelife
Captain
Captain
Posts: 14191
Joined: January 2013

Re: Brexit

Unread post by Onelife »

Hi Barney.......its probably me but l can never open any of your links for some reason........what was the crux of the article?

User avatar

Jack Staff
First Officer
First Officer
Posts: 1656
Joined: September 2016

Re: Brexit

Unread post by Jack Staff »

Barney, there is nothing inherently wrong in that article.
But it is written by someone who does not know the history of Ireland.
Neither do I, but I know I don't know.
'Everything would be fine if we just ignore the border issue' is not an option, for the EU and especially for us.
Testiculi ad Brexitum. Venceremos.

User avatar

barney
Deputy Captain
Deputy Captain
Posts: 5853
Joined: March 2013
Location: Instow Devon

Re: Brexit

Unread post by barney »

Onelife wrote: 24 Jan 2019, 13:28
Hi Barney.......its probably me but l can never open any of your links for some reason........what was the crux of the article?
The general thrust Keith, is that both sides of made a pigs whatnot of the 'negotiation'.

Our side for starting in the wrong place and agreeing to the EU dictating all of the terms.
The EU for making such a big deal over Ireland. The author saying that things could have got sorted without EU intransigence.

I think that we will eventually see some sort of time limited back stop, say of five years or something.
Let's be frank, if the two parties cannot agree a trade deal during the implementation period and the not within another five years, then they never will.
So, if no agreement, the whole of the UK will remain as is, not just N.I.
That seems reasonable to me.
In the meantime, it will leave us free to seek out new trade deal on our own, without billions in payments to the EU and an end to uncontrolled immigration.

Now that a second referendum is off the table, things should progress more smoothly in Parliament.
Free and Accepted

User avatar

Jack Staff
First Officer
First Officer
Posts: 1656
Joined: September 2016

Re: Brexit

Unread post by Jack Staff »

barney wrote: 24 Jan 2019, 16:11
Now that a second referendum is off the table, things should progress more smoothly in Parliament.
:lol:
You wish!
Testiculi ad Brexitum. Venceremos.

Return to “General Chat”