If anyone is having problems logging in and is getting the following message:

"The submitted form was invalid. Try submitting again"

Then try clearing your browser cache

Current Affairs

Chat about anything here
User avatar

oldbluefox
Ex Team Member
Posts: 12538
Joined: January 2013
Location: Cumbria

Re: Current Affairs

Unread post by oldbluefox »

I'm all in favour of the Australian/New Zealand models. No messing around with human rights there. Perhaps it's time we started considering the rights of the rest of us who have to suffer because some cannot do as they are told or refuse to.
I was taught to be cautious

User avatar

Onelife
Captain
Captain
Posts: 14202
Joined: January 2013

Re: Current Affairs

Unread post by Onelife »

We are in a National Emergency situation and as such the Government shouldn’t be asking people to follow rules, they should be making them follow the rules.

The problem is we have a PM who is saying the right things in order to disguise his real intentions which is to allow the virus rip through the country imo.

User avatar

Onelife
Captain
Captain
Posts: 14202
Joined: January 2013

Re: Current Affairs

Unread post by Onelife »

oldbluefox wrote: 07 Jan 2022, 16:53
I'm all in favour of the Australian/New Zealand models. No messing around with human rights there. Perhaps it's time we started considering the rights of the rest of us who have to suffer because some cannot do as they are told or refuse to.
The thing is Foxy, the citizens of Australian and New Zealand still have respect for their country, our country has lost itself in a quagmire of respecting other country’s cultures over our own.

User avatar

Mervyn and Trish
Commodore
Commodore
Posts: 17037
Joined: February 2013

Re: Current Affairs

Unread post by Mervyn and Trish »

Onelife wrote: 07 Jan 2022, 17:03
We are in a National Emergency situation and as such the Government shouldn’t be asking people to follow rules, they should be making them follow the rules.

The problem is we have a PM who is saying the right things in order to disguise his real intentions which is to allow the virus rip through the country imo.
You are of course entitled to your opinion. But I think you're wrong. The problem is simply whatever he does someone will whinge.

#BashBoris #Can'tWin

User avatar

david63
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 10948
Joined: January 2012
Location: Lancashire

Re: Current Affairs

Unread post by david63 »

oldbluefox wrote: 07 Jan 2022, 16:53
I'm all in favour of the ... New Zealand models. No messing around with human rights there.
That is the impression that they portray to the rest of the world but the reality is somewhat different

User avatar

oldbluefox
Ex Team Member
Posts: 12538
Joined: January 2013
Location: Cumbria

Re: Current Affairs

Unread post by oldbluefox »

What is the true picture?
I was taught to be cautious

User avatar

Onelife
Captain
Captain
Posts: 14202
Joined: January 2013

Re: Current Affairs

Unread post by Onelife »

oldbluefox wrote: 07 Jan 2022, 18:19
What is the true picture?
Not sure if this is the true picture but it looks like a country willing to embrace change...

https://www.stuff.co.nz/national/957871 ... -the-world

User avatar

Ray B
Senior First Officer
Senior First Officer
Posts: 3549
Joined: January 2013

Re: Current Affairs

Unread post by Ray B »

I do hope Australia do not cave in due to the media, as has been reported, being embarrassed over the Novak Djokovic situation.
The exemption given to him was just permission to play in the tournament. The government entry rules differ somewhat and should apply to everyone who tries to enter the country unvaccinated just because they don't want the jab.
Their Country, their rules.
Don't worry, be happy

User avatar

Mervyn and Trish
Commodore
Commodore
Posts: 17037
Joined: February 2013

Re: Current Affairs

Unread post by Mervyn and Trish »

Agree Ray.

User avatar

Kendhni
Ex Team Member
Posts: 6520
Joined: January 2013

Re: Current Affairs

Unread post by Kendhni »

Onelife wrote: 07 Jan 2022, 17:03
The problem is we have a PM who is saying the right things in order to disguise his real intentions which is to allow the virus rip through the country imo.
That was his plan A at the beginning, but he caved in to pressure. Unfortunately Johnson is now under control of the back benchers who are against any tightening so all he really has left are his sound bites ... he was always good with a sound bite. He is a wounded PM on borrowed time, and will hopefully be kicked out as soon as conservatives find where they left their integrity.

User avatar

towny44
Deputy Captain
Deputy Captain
Posts: 9671
Joined: January 2013
Location: Huddersfield

Re: Current Affairs

Unread post by towny44 »

Kendhni wrote: 07 Jan 2022, 21:10
Onelife wrote: 07 Jan 2022, 17:03
The problem is we have a PM who is saying the right things in order to disguise his real intentions which is to allow the virus rip through the country imo.
That was his plan A at the beginning, but he caved in to pressure. Unfortunately Johnson is now under control of the back benchers who are against any tightening so all he really has left are his sound bites ... he was always good with a sound bite. He is a wounded PM on borrowed time, and will hopefully be kicked out as soon as conservatives find where they left their integrity.
However since you dont believe the conservatives have any integrity that will be never then?
John

Trainee Pensioner since 2000

User avatar

Manoverboard
Ex Team Member
Posts: 13014
Joined: January 2013
Location: Dorset

Re: Current Affairs

Unread post by Manoverboard »

Mervyn and Trish wrote: 07 Jan 2022, 09:53
Manoverboard wrote: 07 Jan 2022, 09:13
Nearly 3/4 of a million wanting Blair's knighthood rescinded :clap: :clap:
And that's just the ones who could be bothered to sign. Count me in.
Good man the figure has now topped 1,000,000 :thumbup:

It is now being reported that Lady Blair claimed nearly £80,000 for furlough payments but unlike many others who have extreme wealth has yet to make any sort of repayment of these monies :thumbdown:

Greed comes to mind ...
Keep smiling, it's good for your well being


CaroleF
Senior First Officer
Senior First Officer
Posts: 2184
Joined: January 2013
Location: Hampshire

Re: Current Affairs

Unread post by CaroleF »

The difficulty is that this particular honour is not awarded by the Government but by the Queen. It is her appointment. There are certain honours that are solely up to the Queen. Another one is the Companion of Honour, this too is an award bestowed by the Queen. So the Government does not have the power to rescind the honour.

Carole

User avatar

Kendhni
Ex Team Member
Posts: 6520
Joined: January 2013

Re: Current Affairs

Unread post by Kendhni »

I am more surprised, given Cherie Blair's feelings about the monarchy, that she would allow him to accept it.

User avatar

oldbluefox
Ex Team Member
Posts: 12538
Joined: January 2013
Location: Cumbria

Re: Current Affairs

Unread post by oldbluefox »

Kendhni wrote: 08 Jan 2022, 10:52
I am more surprised, given Cherie Blair's feelings about the monarchy, that she would allow him to accept it.
Like many in that position, she is a hypocrite.

I don't know what the Queen was thinking about although I do wonder if much of the time she just rubber stamps what the advisors put forward to her.
I was taught to be cautious


Quizzical Bob
Senior First Officer
Senior First Officer
Posts: 3951
Joined: January 2013

Re: Current Affairs

Unread post by Quizzical Bob »

Manoverboard wrote: 08 Jan 2022, 09:42
Mervyn and Trish wrote: 07 Jan 2022, 09:53
Manoverboard wrote: 07 Jan 2022, 09:13
Nearly 3/4 of a million wanting Blair's knighthood rescinded :clap: :clap:
And that's just the ones who could be bothered to sign. Count me in.
Good man the figure has now topped 1,000,000 :thumbup:

It is now being reported that Lady Blair claimed nearly £80,000 for furlough payments but unlike many others who have extreme wealth has yet to make any sort of repayment of these monies :thumbdown:

Greed comes to mind ...
Furlough money does not go to the company but is paid over to the staff. The company retains none of it and is still faced with other costs of employment.

User avatar

Manoverboard
Ex Team Member
Posts: 13014
Joined: January 2013
Location: Dorset

Re: Current Affairs

Unread post by Manoverboard »

Quizzical Bob wrote: 08 Jan 2022, 11:05
Furlough money does not go to the company but is paid over to the staff. The company retains none of it and is still faced with other costs of employment.
Indeed so, in this instance rather than paying the staff herself she made them apply for furlough payments which she was perfectly entitled to do. In many cases the value of these payments has been paid back into the pot because the impact on profits for that Company was far less than was anticipated.
Keep smiling, it's good for your well being


Quizzical Bob
Senior First Officer
Senior First Officer
Posts: 3951
Joined: January 2013

Re: Current Affairs

Unread post by Quizzical Bob »

Manoverboard wrote: 08 Jan 2022, 11:16
Quizzical Bob wrote: 08 Jan 2022, 11:05
Furlough money does not go to the company but is paid over to the staff. The company retains none of it and is still faced with other costs of employment.
Indeed so, in this instance rather than paying the staff herself she made them apply for furlough payments which she was perfectly entitled to do. In many cases the value of these payments has been paid back into the pot because the impact on profits for that Company was far less than was anticipated.
?
Employees can’t apply themselves for furlough money.

User avatar

Manoverboard
Ex Team Member
Posts: 13014
Joined: January 2013
Location: Dorset

Re: Current Affairs

Unread post by Manoverboard »

Quizzical Bob wrote: 08 Jan 2022, 12:20
Manoverboard wrote: 08 Jan 2022, 11:16
Quizzical Bob wrote: 08 Jan 2022, 11:05
Furlough money does not go to the company but is paid over to the staff. The company retains none of it and is still faced with other costs of employment.
Indeed so, in this instance rather than paying the staff herself she made them apply for furlough payments which she was perfectly entitled to do. In many cases the value of these payments has been paid back into the pot because the impact on profits for that Company was far less than was anticipated.
? Employees can’t apply themselves for furlough money.
Her staff were not paid by her but they received furlough payments, how this happened is of course a complete mystery :lol: :wave:
Keep smiling, it's good for your well being


Quizzical Bob
Senior First Officer
Senior First Officer
Posts: 3951
Joined: January 2013

Re: Current Affairs

Unread post by Quizzical Bob »

Manoverboard wrote: 08 Jan 2022, 12:33
Quizzical Bob wrote: 08 Jan 2022, 12:20
Manoverboard wrote: 08 Jan 2022, 11:16

Indeed so, in this instance rather than paying the staff herself she made them apply for furlough payments which she was perfectly entitled to do. In many cases the value of these payments has been paid back into the pot because the impact on profits for that Company was far less than was anticipated.
? Employees can’t apply themselves for furlough money.
Her staff were not paid by her but they received furlough payments, how this happened is of course a complete mystery :lol: :wave:
Legally and practically the staff have to be paid through a PAYE scheme. This will be one operated by a company. Individuals cannot neither apply for nor receive furlough payments.

User avatar

Gill W
Senior First Officer
Senior First Officer
Posts: 4897
Joined: January 2013
Location: Kent

Re: Current Affairs

Unread post by Gill W »

oldbluefox wrote: 07 Jan 2022, 16:39
Whilst I agree with you can you imagine the uproar from parents? The local rag would be camped outside the school gates, TV cameras trained on the school entrance, Socialist Worker would be there with their banners and the activists proclaiming their human rights to education were being denied them would be screaming loudly.
What it needs is for the government to come out and make it mandatory that face masks be worn and make it clear that children without masks will be sent home. Those who cannot wear masks for whatever reason should wear a visor. We are far too soft in this country.
We went into town yesterday and Omicron is rife up here at the moment but I was staggered by the number of adults in shops not wearing masks and neither were their teenage offspring. It's hardly surprising that the virus is spreading.
I completely agree. I've been saying for ages that, as we are in a pandemic, we need firm action from the government. Up until this point, the general reaction to that on this board has been 'I know what to do, I don't need the government to tell me what to do'. Even when I've said that firm action is needed so that EVERYBODY complies, I have been sneered at.

Glad to hear you are finally coming round to me way of thinking.

Unfortunately, the firm action that is required is unlikely to happen - for reasons that have already been mentioned.

I think the majority in this country would like action that makes the anti maskers and and anti-vaxxers lives as difficult as possible (Macron style). Unfortunately, this won't be happening either, more's the pity.
Gill

User avatar

oldbluefox
Ex Team Member
Posts: 12538
Joined: January 2013
Location: Cumbria

Re: Current Affairs

Unread post by oldbluefox »

Gill W wrote: 08 Jan 2022, 15:39

Glad to hear you are finally coming round to me way of thinking.
Thought I was on Stephen's Mornin All thread for a minute 😂😂😂
I was taught to be cautious

User avatar

towny44
Deputy Captain
Deputy Captain
Posts: 9671
Joined: January 2013
Location: Huddersfield

Re: Current Affairs

Unread post by towny44 »

oldbluefox wrote: 08 Jan 2022, 15:50
Gill W wrote: 08 Jan 2022, 15:39

Glad to hear you are finally coming round to me way of thinking.
Thought I was on Stephen's Mornin All thread for a minute 😂😂😂
Now that we are, mainly, fully vaccinated, sooner or later we are going to have to learn to live with covid. We do still have a problem with hospitalizations which are putting pressure on our hospitals, but these are mainly non vaccinated patients so we need to find a way to coerce the doubters to get jabbed.
Then if covid follows the pattern of other pandemics, each new mutation should be weaker, even if they are more infectious, so the sooner we accept that, then the sooner we can get back to normal, and leave the fear factor behind.
John

Trainee Pensioner since 2000

User avatar

Kendhni
Ex Team Member
Posts: 6520
Joined: January 2013

Re: Current Affairs

Unread post by Kendhni »

150,000 deaths in the UK have been put down to COVID. A very sobering thought ... that is over 200 per day and about 1 in every 450 people.

User avatar

Mervyn and Trish
Commodore
Commodore
Posts: 17037
Joined: February 2013

Re: Current Affairs

Unread post by Mervyn and Trish »

It is indeed sobering. Of course the Covid deniers will still tell us it's no worse than a cold or flu and the figures are faked.

Return to “General Chat”